BowerBird vs uBlock Origin Lite

Not a competitor on blocking. BowerBird runs alongside it.

What uBlock Origin Lite does better

Blocking coverage, plainly. uBOL is written by the person who invented the filtering approach the rest of the industry copies, it is free, and it is open source. It fits far more filters inside the same MV3 budget than we do.

Where BowerBird is different

The annoyance layer, and finding it for you. Filter lists are structurally weak on cookie walls, newsletter modals and sticky clutter, because those are visual, per-site and constantly shifting.

Side by side

uBlock Origin LiteBowerBird
Ad and tracker blocking coverageBest in class25,499 rules, same list sources
Filters dropped for the MV3 budgetFar fewerAbout 87,000, and we say so
Site access requested at installNoneNone
Point-and-click element hidingYesYes, with a scope ladder
Finds the clutter for youNoYes (Pro)
PriceFreeFree, Pro is $12 one-time

Which one to install

If you want the most blocking, install uBlock Origin Lite. If you want the page arranged, install BowerBird. Neither conflicts with the other, and both install without asking to read every site you visit.

Hide your first annoyance free - no account, no subscription.

Get it free for Edge Get it free for Firefox

Free includes unlimited manual rules. Pro is $12 one-time, no subscription.

The part that is not a feature comparison

BowerBird asks for no site access at install. Ad and tracker blocking runs on rules the browser applies itself, so it needs none. Access to a single site is requested from your click, the first time you hide something there, and can be taken back in settings.

Hide your first annoyance free - no account, no subscription.

Get it free for Edge Get it free for Firefox

Free includes unlimited manual rules. Pro is $12 one-time, no subscription.

Other comparisons